LAW is FICTION
What you have grown up to assume is 'the law' is not, in point of fact, the law.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
A Statute is a rule created by a representative governing body of a society designed to create common goals, which carries the force of law by the consent of the governed.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The 'laws of Parliament' are Statutes. Statutes require (without a single exception) the CONSENT of the governed.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
OUR natural inalienable rights were given by The Creator aka God.
OUR duties: Do no harm. Do not steal. Do not make false contracts.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
A Statute is a rule created by a representative governing body of a society designed to create common goals, which carries the force of law by the consent of the governed.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The 'laws of Parliament' are Statutes. Statutes require (without a single exception) the CONSENT of the governed.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
OUR natural inalienable rights were given by The Creator aka God.
OUR duties: Do no harm. Do not steal. Do not make false contracts.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
GOD's Laws or NATURAL Law.
Do no harm. Steal nothing.
Do not make false contracts.
Man made Statutes, Acts, By-Laws, Rules are fictions.
Simple as that!
Do no harm. Steal nothing.
Do not make false contracts.
Man made Statutes, Acts, By-Laws, Rules are fictions.
Simple as that!
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Since Tony Blair came to power, the Labour Party has created more than 3000 new criminal offences.
Since Tony Blair came to power, the Labour Party has created more than 3000 new criminal offences.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Oath:
I swear by Almighty God that I will tell the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth. Affirmation:
I solemnly, sincerely and truly declare and affirm that I will tell the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth. LIES, FICTIONS, NO human being can know the Truth, the Whole Truth.
PERJURY has been COMMITTED EVERY TIME someone has taken the above oaths.
Oath:
I swear by Almighty God that I will tell the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth. Affirmation:
I solemnly, sincerely and truly declare and affirm that I will tell the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth. LIES, FICTIONS, NO human being can know the Truth, the Whole Truth.
PERJURY has been COMMITTED EVERY TIME someone has taken the above oaths.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Freedom by Khalil Gibran
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Khalil_Gibran
And an orator said, "Speak to us of Freedom."
And he answered:
At the city gate and by your fireside I have seen you prostrate yourself and worship your own freedom,
Even as slaves humble themselves before a tyrant and praise him though he slays them.
Ay, in the grove of the temple and in the shadow of the citadel I have seen the freest among you wear their freedom as a yoke and a handcuff.
And my heart bled within me; for you can only be free when even the desire of seeking freedom becomes a harness to you, and when you cease to speak of freedom as a goal and a fulfillment.
You shall be free indeed when your days are not without a care nor your nights without a want and a grief,
But rather when these things girdle your life and yet you rise above them naked and unbound.
And how shall you rise beyond your days and nights unless you break the chains which you at the dawn of your understanding have fastened around your noon hour?
In truth that which you call freedom is the strongest of these chains, though its links glitter in the sun and dazzle the eyes.
And what is it but fragments of your own self you would discard that you may become free?
If it is an unjust law you would abolish, that law was written with your own hand upon your own forehead.
You cannot erase it by burning your law books nor by washing the foreheads of your judges, though you pour the sea upon them.
And if it is a despot you would dethrone, see first that his throne erected within you is destroyed.
For how can a tyrant rule the free and the proud, but for a tyranny in their own freedom and a shame in their won pride?
And if it is a care you would cast off, that care has been chosen by you rather than imposed upon you.
And if it is a fear you would dispel, the seat of that fear is in your heart and not in the hand of the feared.
Verily all things move within your being in constant half embrace, the desired and the dreaded, the repugnant and the cherished, the pursued and that which you would escape.
These things move within you as lights and shadows in pairs that cling.
And when the shadow fades and is no more, the light that lingers becomes a shadow to another light.
And thus your freedom when it loses its fetters becomes itself the fetter of a greater freedom.
http://leb.net/gibran/
Freedom by Khalil Gibran
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Khalil_Gibran
And an orator said, "Speak to us of Freedom."
And he answered:
At the city gate and by your fireside I have seen you prostrate yourself and worship your own freedom,
Even as slaves humble themselves before a tyrant and praise him though he slays them.
Ay, in the grove of the temple and in the shadow of the citadel I have seen the freest among you wear their freedom as a yoke and a handcuff.
And my heart bled within me; for you can only be free when even the desire of seeking freedom becomes a harness to you, and when you cease to speak of freedom as a goal and a fulfillment.
You shall be free indeed when your days are not without a care nor your nights without a want and a grief,
But rather when these things girdle your life and yet you rise above them naked and unbound.
And how shall you rise beyond your days and nights unless you break the chains which you at the dawn of your understanding have fastened around your noon hour?
In truth that which you call freedom is the strongest of these chains, though its links glitter in the sun and dazzle the eyes.
And what is it but fragments of your own self you would discard that you may become free?
If it is an unjust law you would abolish, that law was written with your own hand upon your own forehead.
You cannot erase it by burning your law books nor by washing the foreheads of your judges, though you pour the sea upon them.
And if it is a despot you would dethrone, see first that his throne erected within you is destroyed.
For how can a tyrant rule the free and the proud, but for a tyranny in their own freedom and a shame in their won pride?
And if it is a care you would cast off, that care has been chosen by you rather than imposed upon you.
And if it is a fear you would dispel, the seat of that fear is in your heart and not in the hand of the feared.
Verily all things move within your being in constant half embrace, the desired and the dreaded, the repugnant and the cherished, the pursued and that which you would escape.
These things move within you as lights and shadows in pairs that cling.
And when the shadow fades and is no more, the light that lingers becomes a shadow to another light.
And thus your freedom when it loses its fetters becomes itself the fetter of a greater freedom.
http://leb.net/gibran/
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Inalienable_Rights
Martin Luther wrote:
"Furthermore, every man is responsible for his own faith, and he must see it for himself that he believes rightly. As little as another can go to hell or heaven for me, so little can he believe or disbelieve for me; and as little as he can open or shut heaven or hell for me, so little can he drive me to faith or unbelief. Since, then, belief or unbelief is a matter of every one's conscience, and since this is no lessening of the secular power, the latter should be content and attend to its own affairs and permit men to believe one thing or another, as they are able and willing, and constrain no one by force."
Inalienable_Rights
Martin Luther wrote:
"Furthermore, every man is responsible for his own faith, and he must see it for himself that he believes rightly. As little as another can go to hell or heaven for me, so little can he believe or disbelieve for me; and as little as he can open or shut heaven or hell for me, so little can he drive me to faith or unbelief. Since, then, belief or unbelief is a matter of every one's conscience, and since this is no lessening of the secular power, the latter should be content and attend to its own affairs and permit men to believe one thing or another, as they are able and willing, and constrain no one by force."
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
bill of Rights 1689
The threat or promises of any fines, before conviction, is illegal/void, with reference to the BILL OF RIGHTS 1689 ,
which is still an active statute , which is supposed to be in force and upheld , even today.
bill of Rights 1689
The threat or promises of any fines, before conviction, is illegal/void, with reference to the BILL OF RIGHTS 1689 ,
which is still an active statute , which is supposed to be in force and upheld , even today.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Professor James Duane’s now famous 5th Amendment lecture - popularly known as “Don’t talk to the police!” - has amassed a considerable internet following. The lecture, given as part of Regent Law School’s spring preview weekend.
http://video.google.co.uk - Talking+To+The+Police+-+Don Do It!
Professor James Duane’s now famous 5th Amendment lecture - popularly known as “Don’t talk to the police!” - has amassed a considerable internet following. The lecture, given as part of Regent Law School’s spring preview weekend.
http://video.google.co.uk - Talking+To+The+Police+-+Don Do It!
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Terrorism Laws. It is not for the 'Terrorists' but put in place so that they can use these new laws against you
Terrorism Laws. It is not for the 'Terrorists' but put in place so that they can use these new laws against you
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Any action for which I can apply for and receive a licence, consent or permission, must itself be a fundamentally lawful action and therefore no application is required and therefore I do not have to register, apply, submit, beg, pay or be governed to exercise my rights at common-law.
Any action for which I can apply for and receive a licence, consent or permission, must itself be a fundamentally lawful action and therefore no application is required and therefore I do not have to register, apply, submit, beg, pay or be governed to exercise my rights at common-law.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
REMEMBER : Your children are NOT YOUR children.
You Registered your children.
Your children belong to the Government.
YOU BELONG TO THE GOVERNMENT
YOUR SLAVE NUMBER
is your National Insurance Number.
REMEMBER : Your children are NOT YOUR children.
You Registered your children.
Your children belong to the Government.
YOU BELONG TO THE GOVERNMENT
YOUR SLAVE NUMBER
is your National Insurance Number.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Existing courts are open to the public but are owned and operated as a private for profit business by the Law Society.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
You are an animal, a living soul. All men are equal and none can have power over you - unless you submit to their unlawful authority.
Statute Law has been created by men to gain control of other men.
YOU.
Every sovereign man is independent of all laws, except those prescribed by nature and physics. He is not bound by any institutions formed by his fellow-men without his consent.
Black’s Law Dictionary, Eighth Edition
sovereign n. is defined as
"A person, body, or state vested with independent and supreme authority"
Councils break their own
Data Protection Act
by giving your details to third parties.
Freemen do not stand under Acts or Statutes.
http://www.solicitorsfromhell.co.uk/
Someone receives a summons for violation of a statute and appears in court. They then mount a vigorous defence, standing in Common Law jurisdiction. If their understanding is sufficient to the task the judge will have no lawful reason not to accept this defence. - we only have the rights we are prepared to claim. The combative claiming of these rights is the exact opposite of a license (asking for permission from 'mummy'). We are not asking, We are telling.
You see the difference?
You are an animal, a living soul. All men are equal and none can have power over you - unless you submit to their unlawful authority.
Statute Law has been created by men to gain control of other men.
YOU.
Every sovereign man is independent of all laws, except those prescribed by nature and physics. He is not bound by any institutions formed by his fellow-men without his consent.
Black’s Law Dictionary, Eighth Edition
sovereign n. is defined as
"A person, body, or state vested with independent and supreme authority"
Councils break their own
Data Protection Act
by giving your details to third parties.
Freemen do not stand under Acts or Statutes.
http://www.solicitorsfromhell.co.uk/
Someone receives a summons for violation of a statute and appears in court. They then mount a vigorous defence, standing in Common Law jurisdiction. If their understanding is sufficient to the task the judge will have no lawful reason not to accept this defence. - we only have the rights we are prepared to claim. The combative claiming of these rights is the exact opposite of a license (asking for permission from 'mummy'). We are not asking, We are telling.
You see the difference?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
If you stand out from under every jurisdiction (out from under any oath), you stand free and sovereign in common law true.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Why do we have ‘family courts’ and not ‘divorce courts’ ?
Why do we have ‘family courts’ and not ‘divorce courts’ ?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Any action for which I can apply for and receive a licence, consent or permission, must itself be a fundamentally lawful action and therefore no application is required and therefore I do not have to register, apply, submit, beg, pay or be governed to exercise my rights at common-law.
Any action for which I can apply for and receive a licence, consent or permission, must itself be a fundamentally lawful action and therefore no application is required and therefore I do not have to register, apply, submit, beg, pay or be governed to exercise my rights at common-law.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The common law applies to all people, anywhere, everywhere. It's the natural, universally accepted law. You cannot cause harm or loss or breach the peace or commit fraud in your contracts. It covers everything. Theft, murder, perjury, public nuisance, etc.
Admiralty law (statutes, codes, regulations) are specifically restricted in their scope and applicability to the members of that society.
A statute is defined as a legislated rule of society, given the force of law.
A society is defined as a number of people joined by mutual consent to deliberate, determine, and act for a common purpose.
So, statutes are laws to people who have given their consent to be a part of the society. It's like if you have lived on a piece of land your entire life, and some organization came in, claiming to be the government of the land, and tried to get you to pay taxes and follow their policies. You'd tell them they had no jurisdiction, no authority. Because they don't.
No jurisdiction. And it's not because it's a separate piece of land. The fundamental laws of the land provide that all men are created equal and that governments are instilled among men to protect inalienable rights, and that when government becomes destructive of these rights, it is the right of the people to alter/abolish it. You can declare sovereignty and there is nothing anyone can do about it without a gun to your head.
The common law applies to all people, anywhere, everywhere. It's the natural, universally accepted law. You cannot cause harm or loss or breach the peace or commit fraud in your contracts. It covers everything. Theft, murder, perjury, public nuisance, etc.
Admiralty law (statutes, codes, regulations) are specifically restricted in their scope and applicability to the members of that society.
A statute is defined as a legislated rule of society, given the force of law.
A society is defined as a number of people joined by mutual consent to deliberate, determine, and act for a common purpose.
So, statutes are laws to people who have given their consent to be a part of the society. It's like if you have lived on a piece of land your entire life, and some organization came in, claiming to be the government of the land, and tried to get you to pay taxes and follow their policies. You'd tell them they had no jurisdiction, no authority. Because they don't.
No jurisdiction. And it's not because it's a separate piece of land. The fundamental laws of the land provide that all men are created equal and that governments are instilled among men to protect inalienable rights, and that when government becomes destructive of these rights, it is the right of the people to alter/abolish it. You can declare sovereignty and there is nothing anyone can do about it without a gun to your head.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The theoretical roots of civil disobedience are usually traced to Henry David Thoreau's 1849 essay Civil Disobedience. Thoreau believed that the individual, who grants the state its power in the first place, must follow the dictates of his conscience in opposing unjust laws. (His ideas on civil disobedience reflected time he spent imprisoned for his refusal to pay a poll tax that supported the Mexican-American War and slavery.) Today civil disobedience is generally defined as a public, non-violent and conscientious breach of law undertaken with the aim of bringing about a change in laws or government policies.
http://thoreau.eserver.org/
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
A LAW DICTIONARY ADAPTED TO THE CONSTITUTION AND LAWS OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND OF THE SEVERAL STATES OF THE AMERICAN UNION by John Bouvier
Revised Sixth Edition, 1856
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Queen Elizabeth II controls a war machine which has
murdered millions of people.
By paying Taxes, under the Nuremburg Judgements
YOU are equally guilty of War Crimes.
All military personnel, taxpayers and ordinary citizens who support, obey or condone the orders of their government or Parliament to wage aggressive war in which people are killed, are not only criminally liable for a crime against peace under the Nuremburg Principles, but under this new legislation they become accessories to the crimes of genocide, crimes against humanity and war crimes and render themselves liable to prosecution in Britain or The Hague.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
SECRET POLICE UNIT NOW OPERATING
http://tpuc.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=4379
The UK government has established a secretive new police unit a la George Orwell with the powers to detain anyone for any length of time without any due process. The shadowy unit called the Fixated Threat Assessment Centre (FTAC) was covertly established in 2006. The unit includes the services of police psychiatrists. Why? For one very good reason, and one reason only: psychiatrists operate above the law. They can detain ANYONE AT ANY TIME AND FOR NO MORE REASON THAN THEIR STATED OPINION THAT THE PERSON MAY BE A DANGER TO THEMSELVES OR TO OTHERS.
Once forcibly detained by a psychiatrist a person can be legally locked away forever and subjected to despicable �treatments� such as psychotropic drug regimes, lobotomies and electric shocking of the brain. They are not entitled to a trial of any sort, they need face no criminal charges.
A person incarcerated by a psychiatrist has no rights whatsoever. Even Stalin had to produce his prisoners in court eventually. The miserable occupants of Guantanamo retain the certainty that one day they will face justice, or at least that they will have their day in court; the occupants of psychiatric prisons have no such comfort.
It is a thin line that separates a rule of law democracy from a totalitarian dictatorship. The FTAC crosses that line. For many years our individual freedoms have been incrementally cut away. The FTAC rips the flesh off freedom and lays bare the bones of repression for all decent and honest people to see. The FTAC represents nothing less that the repeal of Habeas Corpus with its right of trial and its protection from arbitrary state detention.
A Writ of Habeas Corpus orders that a prisoner is to be brought before a court so that the court can then determine whether that person is serving a lawful sentence or should be released from custody. The prisoner, or someone acting on behalf of the prisoner if he/she is being held incommunicado can petition the court or an individual judge for a Writ of Habeas Corpus.
The justification for the extreme powers of FRAC is of course terrorism. Experience shows that the powers of the FTAC will be quickly exercised in a far wider sphere than even the most skeptical imagine. Once a law is enacted the very fact of its existence gives it respectability and thus acceptability.
For years society casually turned a blind eye to the total lack of Human Rights for anyone labeled �mentally ill�, never dreaming that the definition might one day be widened sufficiently to cover not only themselves, but everyone who may for any reason be deemed a threat by those in authority.
In the twenty-first century mental illness is presumed to be the normal circumstance and sanity deemed to exist only after �treatment� by a psychiatrist.
We live in a nightmare world that is starting to exceed the imaginings of even George Orwell.
Fixated Threat Assessment Centre (FTAC) tasked to intimidate critics of Jacqui Smith?
The UKColumn was shocked to learn that a member of the public, who wrote letters and emails calling the Home Secretary a communist and criticising her for creating a police state, has been summoned for an interview with his GP. The individual, who wishes to remain anonymous, informed the Column that he was recently surprised to receive a call from his GP asking him to attend the surgery.
Once in front of his doctor, Mr X was stunned to be told that the GP had received a letter from the highly secretive Fixated Threat Assessment Centre (FTAC) following instructions from the Home Secretary herself. Although embarrassed, the GP understood from the communication that he was required to interview Mr X to establish his �state of mind�.
The implications of this incident are extremely serious, as they suggest that anyone who dares to criticise the Home Secretary, or perhaps even the government itself, will be regarded as mentally ill. Clearly for Mr X, Smith�s actions were intended to be a warning and the first step in attempting to brand him mentally ill.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
://elementalsblog.blogspot.com/2009/05/fixated-threat-assessment-centre-ftac.html
The UK government has established a secretive new police unit a la George Orwell with the powers to detain anyone for any length of time without any due process.
The shadowy unit called the Fixated Threat Assessment Centre (FTAC) was covertly established in 2006. The unit includes the services of police psychiatrists. Why? For one very good reason, and one reason only: psychiatrists operate above the law. They can detain ANYONE AT ANY TIME AND FOR NO MORE REASON THAN THEIR STATED OPINION THAT THE PERSON MAY BE A DANGER TO THEMSELVES OR TO OTHERS.
1st. Affivavit sent to Her Majesty The Queen 2nd. Affidavit sent to Her Majesty The Queen Big Brother Watch.org.uk
Disobedience is the true foundation of liberty.
The obedient must be slaves.
~ Henry David Thoreau
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Juristic_person
All men are equal in "Law",
but "policemen" and "policewomen" will steal your DNA.
"Policemen" and "policewomen" will steal your fingerprints.
"Policemen" and "policewomen" will steal your freedom.
BELIEVE NOTHING ~ QUESTION EVERYTHING
://elementalsblog.blogspot.com/2009/05/fixated-threat-assessment-centre-ftac.html
The UK government has established a secretive new police unit a la George Orwell with the powers to detain anyone for any length of time without any due process.
The shadowy unit called the Fixated Threat Assessment Centre (FTAC) was covertly established in 2006. The unit includes the services of police psychiatrists. Why? For one very good reason, and one reason only: psychiatrists operate above the law. They can detain ANYONE AT ANY TIME AND FOR NO MORE REASON THAN THEIR STATED OPINION THAT THE PERSON MAY BE A DANGER TO THEMSELVES OR TO OTHERS.
1st. Affivavit sent to Her Majesty The Queen 2nd. Affidavit sent to Her Majesty The Queen Big Brother Watch.org.uk
Disobedience is the true foundation of liberty.
The obedient must be slaves.
~ Henry David Thoreau
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Juristic_person
All men are equal in "Law",
but "policemen" and "policewomen" will steal your DNA.
"Policemen" and "policewomen" will steal your fingerprints.
"Policemen" and "policewomen" will steal your freedom.
BELIEVE NOTHING ~ QUESTION EVERYTHING
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Established, Fundamental, Axioms
http://www.davidicke.com/forum/showthread.php?t=72914
(As simplified as I can make them, based on the work of Robert-Arthur: Menard, Mary-Elizabeth: Croft and (to some extent Winston Shrout and Irene-Maus: Gravenhorst). Basically it is their work, tweaked a bit by re-writing, and removing 'God' - thereby reducing it to absolute fundamentals)
1) 'Lawful' is what it is all about. 'Lawful' .vs. 'unlawful'. Do not get trapped into discussing 'legal'/'illegal'.
2) In order to empower a representative, you must have the power yourself. You cannot give to anyone something you, yourself do not possess. You cannot give them any more than you, yourself, possess. Consequently you can look at anything any representative does, and say "I must be entitled to do that myself, without - necessarily - empowering someone else to do it for me".
3) In a democracy, 'a majority' does not depend on 'large numbers'. A majority can be as low as ONE. And that ONE must, of itself, (therefore) carry sufficient empowerment to put any motion into practice. (The US Supreme Court has 9 Members. A 5 - 4 majority carries any ruling. That's 'democracy')
4) Consequent to (3) no Government has more power than you do yourself. The powers are equal. The only difference is that your power is inalienable - it can't be taken away from you - whereas a Government can be replaced by some other set of role players. Consequently YOU are 'supreme'.
5) 'Requesting permission' is the act of a child. 'Licencing' is 'begging for permission' and 'submitting to someone else's will'. Adults do not beg permission for something they are lawfully entitled to do, and prepared to take full responsibility for so doing. Anything for which a licence can be granted must, by definition, be fundamentally lawful (otherwise it would be incapable of being licenced), and there is, therefore, absolutely no need for an adult to 'ask such permission'. The act of 'obtaining a licence' is the act of throwing away a fundamental Right, and substituting a (revocable) privilege instead.
6) 'Registration' of anything transfers superior ownership to the entity accepting the registration. Once an item has been registered, you are no longer the OWNER (even though you will still be paying for the item), but instead you become the KEEPER. This includes cars, houses, children (who become 'wards of the state' by virtue of a birth registration), etc. ('regis ...' = handing ownership to The Crown ... which, by the way, is the British Crown in Temple Bar, and NOT Elizabeth II)
7) When parts of the Magna Carta were 'transferred' into Statutes what was actually happening was that fundamental Rights were being transferred into privileges. Thus they were being watered down. Diffused. Being rendered powerless.
8) In all cases you are always being OFFERED A SERVICE - which includes 'benefits' - in the form of privileges. You are always fully entitled to waive such services, and of course you will also be waiving the attendant benefits, as you so choose. Your choice is - ultimately - to either assert your (inalienable) Rights, or accept (revocable) privileges.
9) The law can give rise to a FICTION, but a fiction cannot give rise to a law. Consequently a legal fiction called THE GOVERNMENT has no power to make LAW. It is, in point of fact, BOUND BY LAW (like everyone else, and including all other legal fictions). PARLIAMENT is another legal fiction entity. Statutes created by Parliament are not, therefore, the LAW. They are 'legislated rules for a society' and ONLY APPLICABLE TO MEMBERS OF THAT SOCIETY. Join a different society, and you would be bound by a different set of rules. (If this were not the case it would be impossible to become, for example, a Freemason and be bound by the rules of Freemasonry). Statutes are nothing more than the Company Policy of THE UNITED KINGDOM CORPORATION, or THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA CORPORATION, etc. (See 'society', below)
10) Only a sovereign flesh and blood human being, with a living soul, has a Mind. Only something with a Mind is capable of devising a CLAIM. Legal fictions are soulless, and do not possess a distinct Mind. They cannot, therefore, in LAW, make a CLAIM.
11) Consequent to the foregoing, and since the Judiciary in a court de facto derives all its power from colour-of-law/Statutes, then no court de facto has any power over you as a sovereign human being, IN FACT (although, of course, they don't bother to tell you!). A court de jure is the only kind of court to which you are subject under Common Law, and there are none of those left (unless you insist that the court operates de jure, by demanding a Trial by Jury. But they will attempt to resist that with every fibre in their 'corporate', soulless, 'bodies').
12) YOU, and your fellow countrymen, constitute the entire and total 'wealth' of your country. The resources may be considered as assets, but without you & your fellow countrymen they are worthless. A field must be ploughed, and seeded, before potatoes will grow. Once grown they must be dug up, bagged, and transported before they can do the worthwhile job of sustaining life. Without the efforts of you, and your countrymen, NOTHING can happen, and your country itself is a worthless lump of soil.
13) A Society is, in essence, nothing more than a grouping of like-minded souls since it is defined as a number of people joined by mutual consent to deliberate, determine and act for a common goal. A society makes its own rules, and its Members are duty-bound to follow them. Different societies can exist, having their own unique set of rules. One way of 'choking' the action of a court de facto is to claim membership of a society that only exists in Common Law jurisdiction. The World Freeman Society has been set up precisely for this purpose.
14) Contractual obligation. For ANY contract to be lawful, INCLUDING A CONTRACT BETWEEN YOURSELF AS PLAINTIFF OR DEFENDANT IN A COURT DE FACTO, it must comprise the following:
A) FULL DISCLOSURE by both parties. Neither party can later claim 'you should have known' if it was not specifically declared at the time of making the contract.
B) A CONSIDERATION offered by both parties, this being the subject of the exchange. It must be a sum of money, or an item of value. Both parties agree that their CONSIDERATION is worth (to them) the other party's CONSIDERATION.
C) LAWFUL TERMS & CONDITIONS for the contract, to which both parties agree.
D) 'Wet' SIGNATURES of both parties. This means hand-written SIGNATURES, as made by two human beings.
Even though businesses and officials act as though there is a lawful contract in place, 99 times out of 100 these rules have not been followed. (Maybe it is 999 times out of 1,000 - or even more!). Standing on these 4 rules, requesting proofs, is the simplest way of stalemating just about every action that may be taken against you. (See No. 16, below)
15. Agreement to pay. Consequent to (14) above, all 'payment demands', that could result in court actions against you, can be stopped by 'conditionally agreeing to pay the sum demanded', subject to proofs that the 4 rules were followed in the first place. (Make sure you send this letter by registered post, heading it 'Notice of Conditional Agreement' and including 'Without Prejudice' in a suitable place). In almost all cases no proofs are possible (because the rules were never followed lawfully). However, by 'agreeing to pay' you have removed all CONTROVERSY. Thus a court action, which is only there to adjudicate on CONTROVERSY, cannot take place. If you receive a Summons, you can write back (registered!) with a copy of your agreement to pay, subject to the proofs being presented. The court will consider that any further action is 'frivolous', i.e. a complete waste of its time, since there is no CONTROVERSY on which it can adjudicate. (The court may even consider whoever applied to the court to be in contempt). (See No. 16, below)
16. "I feel 'guilty', because I owe the money". No, you don't owe a damn thing! When taking out the loan, you were 'loaned' back what was yours in the first place. You created the 'money' when you signed the Loan or Credit Application. By doing so, YOU gave THEM a Negotiable Instrument called 'the money'. They cashed this in(*), and then used that to loan you back your own money. You don't owe a damn thing! THEY owe YOU - an apology at the very least - for applying this confidence trick on you - AND FOR CHASING YOU FOR SOMETHING YOU ALREADY GAVE THEM.
(* Actually they just could have walked away with your cash. But they didn't, because they are greedy, greedy, greedy, greedy. They knew they could get you to pay everything back, and also to pay them INTEREST on top of that. Thus they had already been paid in full ONCE when they cashed in on your money, took a risk by offering it back to you, and reckoned on being paid TWICE OR EVEN MORE via the 'interest'. Are you just beginning to feel slightly less sympathetic? If not, I don't know what else to say.
"Can this really be true?" Answer: Yes, because there is no other way. Banks are not allowed (by LAW) to lend Depositor's money (which is held by them 'in trust'). Loan Companies and Credit Card Companies (etc.) have no Deposit Money in the first place! Do they? So how else could they do it, then?)
17. 'Responsibility' .vs. 'Authority'. You can DELEGATE authority, but you can only SHARE responsibility. In other words, if you task (delegate) someone to do something, you still retain the RESPONSIBILITY for getting it done, and for anything that may happen as a result. If, for example, a Police Officer carries out any order, given by a superior, then that Officer is personally responsible for what may occur as a result, and all those up the chain of command are considered accomplices, in LAW.
The Common Good = Collectivism
http://www.lewrockwell.com/shaffer/shaffer198.html
by Butler Shaffer
Anyone who examined the "equal protection of the laws" concept in practice would quickly realize that no law applies with equal force to people. Laws are enacted for the purpose of imposing restraints on some people for the benefit of others. Proposed legislation requiring everyone to pursue their self-interests would never be enacted because it would not differentiate one group from another and, in the process, provide its advocates with a comparative advantage.
.................
~~~
Politically-structured collectivism, in whatever form it manifests itself, debilitates and disables individuals, depriving each of us of our biological and experiential uniqueness. This, of course, is its purpose. As long as men and women think of themselves as little more than fungible units in a group-think monolith, they and their children will continue to be ground down into a common pulp useful only to their masters. Collectivism is a religion for losers; a belief system that allows the state to marshal the wealth and energies of people for a coerced redistribution to those it favors.
..............
~~~~
The Core of the Teachings Written by Krishnamurti in 1980 at the request of his biographer Mary Lutyens. Man has built in himself images as a fence of security—religious, political, personal. These manifest as symbols, ideas, beliefs. The burden of these images dominates man’s thinking, his relationships, and his daily life. These images are the causes of our problems for they divide man from man.
The Core of the Teachings
Written by Krishnamurti in 1980 at the request of his biographer Mary Lutyens.
http://www.jkrishnamurti.org/about-k...-teachings.php
Below is the Articles 1-2 of Hitler's Enabling Act. Plain and simple. Law to Remedy the Distress of the People and the Empire
The Reichstag has enacted the following law, which is hereby proclaimed with the assent of the Reichsrat, it having been established that the requirements for a constitutional amendment have been fulfilled:
Article 1
In addition to the procedure prescribed by the constitution, laws of the Reich may also be enacted
by the government of the Reich. This includes the laws referred to by Articles 85 Paragraph 2 and Article 87 of the constitution.[1]
Article 2
Laws enacted by the government of the Reich may deviate from the constitution as long as they do not affect the institutions of the Reichstag and the Reichsrat. The rights of the President remain undisturbed.
Below is 22(3) of The Civil Contingencies Act 2004
Emergency regulations may make provision of any kind that could be made by
Act of Parliament or by the exercise of the Royal Prerogative; in particular,
regulations may--
(a) confer a function on a Minister of the Crown, on the Scottish Ministers,
on the National Assembly for Wales, on a Northern Ireland
department, on a coordinator appointed under section 24 or on any
other specified person (and a function conferred may, in particular,
be--
(i) a power, or duty, to exercise a discretion;
(ii) a power to give directions or orders, whether written or oral);
(b) provide for or enable the requisition or confiscation of property (with
or without compensation);
(c) provide for or enable the destruction of property, animal life or plant
life (with or without compensation);
(d) prohibit, or enable the prohibition of, movement to or from a specified
place;
(e) require, or enable the requirement of, movement to or from a specified
place;
(f) prohibit, or enable the prohibition of, assemblies of specified kinds, at
specified places or at specified times;
(g) prohibit, or enable the prohibition of, travel at specified times;
(h) prohibit, or enable the prohibition of, other specified activities;
(i) create an offence of--
(i) failing to comply with a provision of the regulations;
(ii) failing to comply with a direction or order given or made under
the regulations;
(iii) obstructing a person in the performance of a function under or
by virtue of the regulations;
(j) disapply or modify an enactment or a provision made under or by
virtue of an enactment;
(k) require a person or body to act in performance of a function (whether
the function is conferred by the regulations or otherwise and whether
or not the regulations also make provision for remuneration or
compensation);
(l) enable the Defence Council to authorise the deployment of Her
Majesty’s armed forces;
(m) make provision (which may include conferring powers in relation to
property) for facilitating any deployment of Her Majesty’s armed
forces;
(n) confer jurisdiction on a court or tribunal (which may include a tribunal
established by the regulations);
(o) make provision which has effect in relation to, or to anything done in--
(i) an area of the territorial sea,
(ii) an area within British fishery limits, or
(iii) an area of the continental shelf;
(p) make provision which applies generally or only in specified
circumstances or for a specified purpose;
(q) make different provision for different circumstances or purposes.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
QUOTE: It cannot be too clearly understood that this is not a free country, and it will be an evil day for the legal profession when it is. The citizens of London must realise that there is almost nothing that they are allowed to do. Prima facie all actions are illegal, if not by Act of Parliament, by Order in Council; and if not by Order in Council, by Departmental or Police Regulations, or by-laws. They may not eat where they like, drink where they like, walk where they like, drive where they like, sit where they like, or sleep where they like. And least of all may they do unusual actions 'for fun'. People must not do things for fun. We are not here for fun. There is no reference to fun in any Act of Parliament. If anything is said in this Court to encourage a belief that Englishmen are entitled to jump off bridges for their own amusement the next thing to go will be the Constitution.
How Do I Know I Am Free?
www.roage.com/main.asp?PageID=162
A Freedom of Information request to Home Office
by mark-william:baker
http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/lawful_rebellion?unfold=1#incoming-29115
Dear Sir or Madam,
hello it seems a lot more people are becoming very annoyed with the
way we are having our rights and liberties abused by parliament by
an amazing amount of statutes and acts under admiralty law
parliament was placed to protect our rights not lie steal and cheat
our rights away from the people.as I'm aware i am on dry land not
at sea and fall under common law jurisdiction under common law i
have seen i have the right for lawful rebellion against the
state.what does lawful rebellion actually entail and can i be
arrested or prosecuted for using my right to lawful rebellion?
Yours faithfully,
mark-william:baker
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
[FOI #11129 email]
Mr Mark-William Baker
Reference: T7443/9 1 June 2009
Dear Mr Baker,
Thank you for your e-mail of 29 April to the Home Office about “lawful rebellion”. Your e-mail has been forwarded to the Direct Communications Unit and I have been asked to reply.
It is not clear what you mean by “lawful rebellion”, if you mean that you wish to demonstrate regarding some deep held conviction or demonstrate your dissatisfaction with Government policy, it is a long-standing tradition in this country that people are free to gather together and to demonstrate their views provided that they do so within the law, unless they endanger public peace. Some limits are placed upon this freedom by the Public Order Act 1986, under which it is an offence to use threatening, abusive or insulting words or behaviour with intent to cause harassment, alarm or distress.
Equally, people have a right to be free to carry out their lawful business without fear of intimidation and violence. There is, of course, a balance to be struck between protecting the rights of those undertaking lawful activities and the rights of demonstrators.
The role of the police in controlling demonstrations is to preserve the peace, to uphold the law and to prevent the commission of offences. Police tactics and decisions on how to achieve these objectives are a matter for the independent operational judgement of chief officers of police.
Under the Public Order Act 1986 chief officers may impose directions on assemblies and public processions to prevent serious public disorder, serious damage to property, or serious disruption to the life of the community. This would relate to the timing of the demonstration, the maximum number of people involved and the route to be taken.
The chief officer may also, under section 13 of the Act, seek the Home Secretary's consent to ban a march if he reasonably believes that the imposition of conditions will not be sufficient to prevent the march resulting in serious public disorder. In all cases, the question of whether to impose conditions or to seek a ban is for the police. The Home Secretary has no power to initiate a ban.
Violent activity cannot be regarded as a legitimate form of protest and the police and the courts have the powers they need to deal with those who engage in such activities. The Public Order Act 1986 gives the police powers to act in respect of a broad canvas of criminal offences relating to public disorder. Sections 1-5 of the Act define offences of varying degrees of seriousness ranging from riot, which is punishable by up to ten years imprisonment, down to behaviour causing or likely to cause harassment, alarm or distress.
In addition, the police have common law powers of arrest if they believe that a breach of the peace is about to take place, or has taken place.
The use of force by the police is governed by Section 3 of the Criminal Law Act 1967, which states that a person may use such force as is reasonable in the circumstances in the prevention of crime, or in effecting or assisting in the lawful arrest of offenders or suspected offenders unlawfully at large.
Yours sincerely
Mr B Foley
Direct Communications Unit
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The basic areas of liberty lose we will be looking at are as follows:
Right to protest
Free speech
Privacy
Detention without Trial
Extradition
Torture
~~~~~~
All men and women on earth are equal and we all have birth rights from the creator. Those rights cannot be taken away. They can only be waived. If you don't know your rights and you don't know how to claim them, then you don't have any rights. Citizens have no rights. They only have privileges given or taken away by the corporations.
The Ten Commercial Maxims by Jack Harper For many people it might come as a surprise (in many cases a pleasant one) if they were informed that essentially all of the law of the world is founded on, derived from, and is a function of ten simple, essential, and fundamental Commercial Maxims
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The police dont like YOU to ask THEM questions. It's completely alien to them. "Until youve established probable cause my friend, there is a
Roman Maximum in law that says quote- Equality before the law is paramount and mandatory - unquote
That means before you have established that I have done anything wrong then you and I are on equal footing my friend no matter what uniform youre wearing so you will treat me with respect and you will speak across to me and not down to me or I will not assist you in anyway shape or form".
The new statutory legistlation of stop and search powers are being abused by the police. You just have to say "No I do not consent. I am not consenting to any searches today. Thank you very much. Am I free to go ? Am I under arrest ? Am I free to go ? Am I under arrest ?".
The police dont like YOU to ask THEM questions. It's completely alien to them. "Until youve established probable cause my friend, there is a
Roman Maximum in law that says quote- Equality before the law is paramount and mandatory - unquote
That means before you have established that I have done anything wrong then you and I are on equal footing my friend no matter what uniform youre wearing so you will treat me with respect and you will speak across to me and not down to me or I will not assist you in anyway shape or form".
The new statutory legistlation of stop and search powers are being abused by the police. You just have to say "No I do not consent. I am not consenting to any searches today. Thank you very much. Am I free to go ? Am I under arrest ? Am I free to go ? Am I under arrest ?".
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
When a Policeman stops you to ask you questions :-
Get your mobile phone out and record it all and make sure the cop knows that you are recording. Say "Hello Officer, I recognise your contact. What is the nature of the intended detention ?"
If he says that you can NOT record the conversation, you say "In that case am I free to go ?" If he "yes" then you are free to go and you say "thank you for your time, goodbye", but if he says "no, youre not free to go", then you say again "What is the naure of the intended detention ?" (Always ask the questions cos you are then in the master position).
If he refuses to tell you what he is stopping you for then you ask him, "Did you witness me breach the peace ?". He will reply "yes" or "no".
If he says "no" then you say "I am now reserving my right not to speak to a police officer who has not witnessed me breach the peace. Thank you and good day". Walk away.
If he asks you for some identification. Ask him "Am I obliged to carry some identification ?". If he asks for your name then ask him if you are obliged to give him your name. The answer to both of those questions is "no". If he says "yes", then he is acting fraudulently, he's not acting as a lawful police officer. Ask him again
"Am I free to go ? AM I FREE TO GO ? AM I FREE TO GO ?" If they continue to detain you then ask "Am I under arrest ? Am I free to go ? Am I under arrest ? Am I free to go ? Am I under arrest ?".
If they CONTINUE to detain you and they give you a sense that you are going to be arrested then IMMEDIATELY say "Officer I'm a peaceful man, if you are going to arrest me, there will be no need for force or violence. However, you are obliged to note that I am operating under protest and duress at all times. I reserve all of my rights at all times and waive none of my rights at any time for any cause or reason".
Then, if they take you down to the station the golden rule is to keep you mouth shut, say nothing, shut up! You do NOT give them permission to take your finger prints, you do not give them consent to ask any further questions, you do not give them consent to put their hands on you in any way shape or form "You do not have consent to touch me officer". They key here is that they can only police BY CONSENT. When they are working with "statutory regulations" THEY NEED YOUR CONSENT. NOTHING CAN BE DONE WITH STATUTORY REGULATIONS WITHOUT YOUR CONSENT - NOTHING! (Obviously if you are guilty of a crime then you should take the punishment like a man).
If they put you in a cell relax, ignore any intimdation and tactics to get you to speak. You are not required to give your fingerprints or to give your DNA (or a blood or a urine sample), NOT WITHOUT YOUR CONSENT. You waive your rights by opening your mouth of giving them what they want. The only way of getting out of the cell (but it could take a day) then you must SHUT UP cos then they have to release you.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Jury_nullification Jury nullification is a de facto and traditional power of juries, not normally disclosed to jurors by the system when they are instructed as to rights and duties. Jury nullification is one of The Most Important things you should know about court.
Where is the zone?
Three feet from sign? Three miles? 3000 miles?
Only drones, morons, and fools “just following orders” can act against humanity.
Civil liberties apply to everyone or they apply to NO-ONE.
42 days detention without trial. ID cards Thought crimes (Information ‘likely’ to be useful to a terrorist. Bin police. RFID tags in bins. Councils spying on people. D Notices. ‘Special constables’ without the slightest training or clue about what laws actually exist in this country.
~~~~~~~~~~
Irene Gravenhorst
a human woman living in
Common Law jurisdiction
~~~~~~~~~~
Advice on Dealing with the Police by
"Hey Mr Policeman you are violating my rights!"
Golden Rule : Keep your mouth shut. Anything you say is used AGAINST you.
Do you have to talk and answer questions whether by police or authority ?
NO
If the policeman asks you for information about yourself. You do not have to answer. But you can tell him that if you want info about an incident, then fair enough but I don't have to give MY DETAILS to them.
Policeman : "What have you got to hide ?"
Respond : "Well, if I told you what I was hiding, then it would no longer be hidden would it!",
"So I'm not telling you what I'm hiding. As it happens, I'm hiding my privacy".
"Privacy is only of value to those who value their privacy and so it's none of yours or anyone business".
Even at the scene of an accident, you dont have to tell them your details. But they will probably put you in a cell. But you are in your rights not to give details. They will try to intimidate you into giving them your details or answering questions or they will "arrest you and charge with obstruction of an officer in the performance of it's duty".
Be prepared to go into a cell to keep your privacy.
Dont fall for their nice talk when they appear sympathetic
SAY NOTHING. DENY NOTHING. YOU HAVE NOT PAST, NO NAME, NO ADDRESS
Jury_nullification Jury nullification is a de facto and traditional power of juries, not normally disclosed to jurors by the system when they are instructed as to rights and duties. Jury nullification is one of The Most Important things you should know about court.
Where is the zone?
Three feet from sign? Three miles? 3000 miles?
Only drones, morons, and fools “just following orders” can act against humanity.
Civil liberties apply to everyone or they apply to NO-ONE.
42 days detention without trial. ID cards Thought crimes (Information ‘likely’ to be useful to a terrorist. Bin police. RFID tags in bins. Councils spying on people. D Notices. ‘Special constables’ without the slightest training or clue about what laws actually exist in this country.
~~~~~~~~~~
Irene Gravenhorst
a human woman living in
Common Law jurisdiction
~~~~~~~~~~
Advice on Dealing with the Police by
"Hey Mr Policeman you are violating my rights!"
Golden Rule : Keep your mouth shut. Anything you say is used AGAINST you.
Do you have to talk and answer questions whether by police or authority ?
NO
If the policeman asks you for information about yourself. You do not have to answer. But you can tell him that if you want info about an incident, then fair enough but I don't have to give MY DETAILS to them.
Policeman : "What have you got to hide ?"
Respond : "Well, if I told you what I was hiding, then it would no longer be hidden would it!",
"So I'm not telling you what I'm hiding. As it happens, I'm hiding my privacy".
"Privacy is only of value to those who value their privacy and so it's none of yours or anyone business".
Even at the scene of an accident, you dont have to tell them your details. But they will probably put you in a cell. But you are in your rights not to give details. They will try to intimidate you into giving them your details or answering questions or they will "arrest you and charge with obstruction of an officer in the performance of it's duty".
Be prepared to go into a cell to keep your privacy.
Dont fall for their nice talk when they appear sympathetic
SAY NOTHING. DENY NOTHING. YOU HAVE NOT PAST, NO NAME, NO ADDRESS
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Fixed Penalty notices are what they say they are:
A NOTICE which one need not pay.
There is only one law of the land, that is Common Law
ALL statutes without exception are fiction. Statutes are rules not laws. Rules given the force of law by our consent.
You can send back parking tickets, fixed penalties, SORN fines etc etc along with a few simple questions.
You'll find a template letter for juat about everything here: http://www.fmotl.com/forum or http://www.fmotl.com
The website isn't pretty....but when you see what it contains it's true beauty shines through
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Black's Law Dictionary states that statutes and acts only have the force of law with the consent of the governed. That as long as you caused no actual harm or loss to another there is no crime and to check www.tpuc.org to find out how to withold consent.
'the law' is what the powers that be say it is today.
'the law' may not be the same tomorrow.
'the law' is what THEY say it is.
INTRODUCTION to the FREEMAN CONCEPT
a paradigm shift in law and politics
Roman Maximum in law that says quote-
Equality before the law is paramount and mandatory
- unquote.
1) STATUTES DO NOT APPLY TO LIVING SOULS. They apply to the fictional entities associated with us by way of contract. E.g. Driving License, Marriage License, Birth Certificate etc.
2) WE CREATE MONEY NOT BANKS. By signing a contract with a bank our promise to pay is used to create the money. This legal agreement becomes a promissory note. The banks then ‘lend’ us the money we created, at interest. Good fun huh?
Bank contracts are invalid as they do not provide any consideration (i.e. they don’t bring anything to the table)
3) COURTS NEED JURISDICTION. They must prove jurisdiction before proceeding with any court action.
4) QUESTION EVERYTHING. If you don’t understand whats going on then you have a duty to find out. It’s your responsibility and rightly so.
5) STAY FOCUSED. It’s too easy to get distracted. Stick to the basic truth as you see it. Nothing is as complicated as it’s made out to be.
MUST WATCH VIDEOS
www.tpuc.org/videos
http://video.google.co.uk/videoplay?
Wake+Up+Call+-+New+World+Order+Documentary
www.constitution.org/bouv/bouvier.htm
KIDNAPPING. The forcible and unlawful abduction and conveying away of a man, woman, or child, from his or her home, without his or her will or consent, and sending such person away, with an intent to deprive him or her of some right. This is an offence at common law.
So in effect if (having committed no crime) the police handcuff you and take you away without your consent, they are in effect kidnapping you, example.. by taking away your right to travel.
Rice v Connolly http://www.andrewgray.uklinux.net/legalsupport/caselaw124.html
"It seems to me quite clear that though every citizen has a moral duty or, if you like, a social duty to assist the police, there is no legal duty to that effect, and indeed the whole basis of the common law is that right of the individual to refuse to answer questions put to him by persons in authority, and a refusal to accompany those in authority to any particular place, short, of course, of arrest. (Parker, CJ, at page 651H–652B of [1966] 2 AllER)"
"In my judgment there is all the difference in the world between deliberately telling a false story, something which on no view a citizen has a right to do, and preserving silence or refusing to answer, something which he has every right to do. (Parker, CJ, at page 652C)"
www.gnu.org/copyleft/
Video: The Largest Street Gang in America ~~~~~~~~~~o0o~~~~~~~~ # Northern Constabulary serves a population of approximately 300,000
# There are around 1,100 staff made up of over 700 Police officers and 400 Support Staff
Police are walking around with chemical weapons, Tasers, Batons and Fixed Cuffs.
www.tpuc.org/node/317 Death or Injury to others, Damage to another's property or using fraud in your contracts, ok these three very heavy crimes are all you can truly be guilty of YES its all you can truly be guilty of!!! Anything else is just STATUTE LAW and the simple to remember definition on this law is laws that only apply if you consent to them!! here look: Statute: "Legislative rule of society given the force of law by the consent of the governed". Yes look at the last four words, "CONSENT OF THE GOVERNED" that is you!! so if you don't consent then they cant do, yes I know what your thinking, but it is that simple. Ok officer walks up to you and says "can I ask you some questions" don't consent, ask him "what the nature is of the intended detention?" and record the conversation and let him see your doing this, use your mobile, 99% of the mobiles available today have recorders to go for it! If he says you cannot record this conversation, then what he is in fact saying is, yep you guessed it!! I don't consent to be recorded, so you simple say "Ok am I free to go?" MORE AT:
www.tpuc.org/node/317
1) STATUTES DO NOT APPLY TO LIVING SOULS. They apply to the fictional entities associated with us by way of contract. E.g. Driving License, Marriage License, Birth Certificate etc.
2) WE CREATE MONEY NOT BANKS. By signing a contract with a bank our promise to pay is used to create the money. This legal agreement becomes a promissory note. The banks then ‘lend’ us the money we created, at interest. Good fun huh?
Bank contracts are invalid as they do not provide any consideration (i.e. they don’t bring anything to the table)
3) COURTS NEED JURISDICTION. They must prove jurisdiction before proceeding with any court action.
4) QUESTION EVERYTHING. If you don’t understand what's going on then you have a duty to find out. It’s your responsibility and rightly so.
5) STAY FOCUSED. It’s too easy to get distracted. Stick to the basic truth as you see it. Nothing is as complicated as it’s made out to be.
